This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese artificial intelligence business that develops open-source big language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, developed the company in 2023 and acts as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 design provides reactions comparable to other contemporary big language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of a similar LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were developed amid United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were planned to restrict the ability of these two nations to establish sophisticated AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its very first complimentary chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had surpassed ChatGPT as the most-downloaded free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share rate to drop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against bigger and more established competitors has actually been described as “upending AI”, [8] making up “the very first chance at what is becoming an international AI area race”, [11] and ushering in “a brand-new era of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative synthetic intelligence algorithms, models, and training details open-source, allowing its code to be easily available for use, modification, viewing, and designing files for building purposes. [13] The business apparently intensely recruits young AI researchers from top Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer system science field to diversify its models’ understanding and capabilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading since the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund concentrated on developing and utilizing AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative artificial intelligence chatbot open source, indicating its code is easily readily available for usage, modification, and watching. This includes approval to gain access to and utilize the source code, in addition to design files, for constructing functions. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had actually developed a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip limitations on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer started a synthetic basic intelligence laboratory dedicated to research establishing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s financial company. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the investors, the laboratory became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital companies hesitated in offering funding as it was unlikely that it would be able to create an exit in a brief time period. [15]

After releasing DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which provided strong efficiency for a low rate, DeepSeek became referred to as the driver for China’s AI model cost war. It was quickly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the rate of their AI models to complete with the business. Despite the low cost charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its rivals that were losing money. [20]

DeepSeek is focused on research study and has no comprehensive strategies for commercialization; [20] this likewise allows its technology to avoid the most rigid arrangements of China’s AI policies, such as needing consumer-facing technology to comply with the federal government’s controls on information. [3]

DeepSeek’s employing preferences target technical capabilities instead of work experience, resulting in a lot of new hires being either recent university graduates or designers whose AI professions are less developed. [18] [3] Likewise, the company hires people with no computer technology background to help its technology understand other subjects and knowledge areas, including being able to produce poetry and perform well on the notoriously tough Chinese college admissions exams (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available for complimentary to both researchers and business users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license agreement (“DeepSeek license”) regarding “open and accountable downstream usage” for the model itself. [21]

They are of the exact same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series consists of 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of guideline data. This produced the Instruct models.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, connected by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B specifications in both Base and Chat types (no Instruct was released). It was developed to take on other LLMs available at the time. The paper claimed benchmark results higher than many open source LLMs at the time, particularly Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]

The architecture was basically the like those of the Llama series. They used the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text acquired by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the 2 Base models was also released concurrently, obtained by training Base by supervised finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B parameters (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed similar efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variant of the standard sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared professionals” that are always queried, and “routed experts” that might not be. They discovered this to assist with professional balancing. In standard MoE, some professionals can become excessively counted on, while other experts might be seldom utilized, squandering criteria. Attempting to balance the professionals so that they are similarly used then causes experts to reproduce the same capability. They proposed the shared specialists to discover core capacities that are frequently used, and let the routed experts to discover the peripheral capacities that are hardly ever utilized. [28]

In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math models specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following design by SFT Base with 776K math issues and their tool-use-integrated detailed solutions. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The benefit model was a process benefit design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd method. [30] This reward model was then used to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K math concerns “related to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward model was continually upgraded during training to prevent benefit hacking. This led to the RL design.

V2

In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series consists of 4 models, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 larger models were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This resulted in DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in 2 stages. The very first stage was trained to fix mathematics and coding problems. This phase utilized 1 reward design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The 2nd phase was trained to be practical, safe, and follow guidelines. This phase utilized 3 reward designs. The helpfulness and safety benefit models were trained on human choice data. The rule-based reward model was manually set. All experienced reward models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the released version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They went with 2-staged RL, because they found that RL on reasoning data had “special qualities” different from RL on general information. For instance, RL on reasoning might improve over more training steps. [31]

The 2 V2-Lite models were smaller sized, and experienced likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist “additional research study and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 models were substantially customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the basic attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and utilized the mixture of experts (MoE) variant formerly published in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was more affordable than its peers with a price of 2 RMB for each million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they launched 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the version at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related instruction information, then integrated with a guideline dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for mathematics problems was calculated by comparing with the ground-truth label. The reward for code issues was created by a benefit model trained to predict whether a program would pass the system tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they released a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is basically the same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, primarily English and Chinese. It included a higher ratio of math and shows than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (math, programs, reasoning) and non-reasoning (imaginative writing, roleplay, easy concern answering) data. Reasoning information was created by “professional models”. Non-reasoning information was created by DeepSeek-V2.5 and checked by humans. – The “expert designs” were trained by beginning with an undefined base model, then SFT on both data, and artificial data produced by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system timely asked the R1 to reflect and confirm throughout thinking. Then the specialist models were RL utilizing an unspecified reward function.
– Each professional design was trained to create simply artificial reasoning information in one particular domain (math, programs, reasoning).
– Expert designs were used, instead of R1 itself, considering that the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, bad formatting, and excessive length”.

4. Model-based benefit designs were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference data including both final reward and chain-of-thought leading to the final reward. The reward model produced benefit signals for both questions with unbiased however free-form responses, and concerns without unbiased answers (such as creative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both reward designs and rule-based reward. The rule-based reward was computed for math issues with a last answer (put in a box), and for shows problems by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek team carried out substantial low-level engineering to achieve effectiveness. They used mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the basic 32-bit, requiring special GEMM routines to collect accurately. They used a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They decreased the interaction latency by overlapping extensively computation and interaction, such as dedicating 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU interaction. They lowered interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the precise machine each expert was on in order to avoid specific devices being queried regularly than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing techniques. [37]

After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 outshined Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being available via DeepSeek’s API, as well as through a chat user interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible reasoning, mathematical reasoning, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek claimed that it went beyond performance of OpenAI o1 on criteria such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it utilized 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 design reached a service faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business also launched some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial information created by R1. [47]

A discussion in between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant resolves it. The assistant initially believes about the reasoning process in the mind and after that supplies the user with the answer. The thinking process and answer are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning process here respond to here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained solely using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they utilized no model-based benefit. All reward functions were rule-based, “primarily” of two types (other types were not defined): precision benefits and format rewards. Accuracy reward was examining whether a boxed answer is right (for mathematics) or whether a code passes tests (for programming). Format reward was inspecting whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has concerns with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to resolve these problems and more improve thinking: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” data all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the same RL process as R1-Zero, however also with a “language consistency benefit” to encourage it to react monolingually. This produced an internal model not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning data from the internal model, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the generated thinking had a wrong final response, then it is gotten rid of). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning data (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic information for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based benefit (for reasoning tasks) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K information synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable method as step 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and responses

DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had gone beyond ChatGPT as the highest-rated free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly responds to questions, resolves logic problems and composes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 utilizes significantly fewer resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as many as 16,000 graphics processing systems (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to have needed just about 2,000 GPUs, specifically the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is approximately one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta spent constructing its most current AI innovation. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive performance at reasonably very little cost has been recognized as potentially challenging the international supremacy of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 design was apparently “on par with” one of OpenAI’s most current designs when used for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley venture capitalist Marc Andreessen also explained R1 as “AI’s Sputnik moment”. [51]

DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media commonly praised DeepSeek as a national asset. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with experts and asked him to supply opinions and suggestions on a draft for comments of the annual 2024 government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of restricted resources has actually highlighted potential limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI development, which consist of export limitations on innovative AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI models subsequently “stimulated market turmoil” [57] and triggered shares in major global innovation companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech companies likewise sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] An international selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, triggered by the release of the R1 model, had actually caused tape-record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of value was cleaned off American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had blended reactions to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “extremely remarkable”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive development. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, consisting of Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed suspicion of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various business, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to use the model in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek limited its brand-new user registration to telephone number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack interfered with the proper performance of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have actually observed that the official application programming user interface (API) version of R1, which runs from servers found in China, uses censorship mechanisms for topics that are considered politically delicate for the federal government of China. For example, the design declines to address concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might at first generate a response, but then deletes it shortly later on and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my existing scope. Let’s talk about something else.” [72] The incorporated censorship mechanisms and constraints can only be removed to a restricted level in the open-source variation of the R1 design. If the “core socialist worths” defined by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are ended. [74] When checked by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s territory,” and stated: “We firmly oppose any form of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are dedicated to achieving the total reunification of the motherland through peaceful methods.” [75] In January 2025, Western researchers had the ability to fool DeepSeek into providing particular responses to a few of these topics by asking for in its response to swap specific letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and personal privacy

Some specialists fear that the federal government of China might utilize the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading out disinformation, security and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy terms state “We save the information we collect in protected servers found in individuals’s Republic of China … We might collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you supply to our design and Services”. Although the data storage and collection policy is consistent with ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired article reports this as security issues. [80] In reaction, the Italian data defense authority is seeking additional details on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of personal data, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had actually begun a nationwide security review. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government prohibited the usage of DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a query into DeepSeek’s use of personal info. [83]

Expert system market in China.

Notes

^ a b c The number of heads does not equal the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required selecting “Deep Think enabled”, and every user could use it just 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s cheap, open AI design DeepSeek delights researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world all set to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s cheaper models and weaker chips bring into question trillions in AI infrastructure spending”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might strike India’s AI ambitions”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals expanding of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you need to understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to slump?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a leading Chinese AI design got rid of US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader”. Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s new AI model outperforms Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, surpasses Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model seems one of the best ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: releasing supercharged reasoning power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first thinking model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 efficiency”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs by means of Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has actually reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn rubbed out US stocks after Chinese company unveils AI chatbot” – via The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek positions a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika states”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI company’s AI model advancement highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot stimulates US market chaos, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek triggers worldwide AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “extremely remarkable”: “We ought to take the developments out of China very, really seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘outstanding'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – via NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders state on DeepSeek’s disruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests massive Nvidia GPU infrastructure”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS customers, including Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek momentarily limited new sign-ups, mentioning ‘large-scale destructive attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually stimulated a $1 trillion panic – and it doesn’t care about complimentary speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We checked out DeepSeek. It worked well, until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the rise of chaos”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek shocks Silicon Valley, offering the AI race its ‘Sputnik minute'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI poses formidable cyber, information privacy hazards”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts urge care over usage of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has actually painted a big TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on data security”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House examines impact of China AI app DeepSeek on national security, official says”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.